Contact
Contact dothinker AI nav for corrections, tool updates, and editorial questions.
Corrections
Use the Submit Tool page to suggest a new tool or update. For factual corrections, include the source URL and the field that should change.
Editorial requests
dothinker AI nav prioritizes workflow pages with clear user intent, source evidence, and practical outputs that can be reviewed by humans.
What to include
For a tool update, include the official URL, the exact claim that should change, and a source that supports the correction. For a workflow request, describe the user, input material, expected output, tools already used, and the point where human review matters most.
What we do not accept
We do not publish unsupported pricing claims, invented feature claims, or requests to hide relevant risk notes. We also do not accept paid placement as a substitute for editorial review or clear sponsorship labeling.
Response scope
dothinker AI nav is a small editorial project, so updates are prioritized by reader usefulness and risk. Corrections that prevent misleading tool selection, unsafe automation, privacy mistakes, or unsupported publishing claims are handled before general promotional requests.
Submission review
A submitted tool is not published automatically. New entries should have a reachable official URL, a clear workflow role, conservative metadata, and at least one source that supports the main description. If the tool is too new or evidence is weak, it should remain unpublished or be described with explicit fact-check notes.
Preferred correction format
The fastest correction request names the page, quotes the outdated or incorrect claim, links to the official source, and explains whether the change affects pricing, availability, privacy, platform policy, API behavior, or a recommended workflow step. This context helps separate urgent factual fixes from general promotional edits.
How this page is used
This trust page supports the same editorial boundary used across the directory: readers should know who maintains the page, how claims are reviewed, where commercial incentives may appear, and how mistakes can be corrected. It also helps separate publisher content from functional pages such as search, submission forms, support hubs, or temporary localized mirrors that may stay available without being treated as search-indexed advertising inventory. When policies, vendors, or product capabilities change, these pages should be updated before expanding ads or automated publishing flows, because trust context is part of the user experience, not a footer-only compliance note. The practical test is simple: a reader should be able to understand the site's incentives, correction path, and review standard without guessing how the directory turns submissions and AI-assisted drafts into published pages. That standard also applies before any new ad placement is introduced publicly.